Amazon has been selling eBooks at a loss in order to increase sales of the Kindle. Amazon would buy the eBooks whole from publishers at about $12 and then sell the eBooks for $9.99. But book publishers, who have been used to more than a decade of high profit hard covers, view these eBooks as a threat to their business rather than an opportunity (seeing a pattern here recording industry?).
Macmillan demanded Amazon change its pricing, focusing on more expensive $12.99-$14.99 charges for new books. Because of Macmillan’s demands, Amazon removed all digital and hard copy versions of Macmillan’s books. The books and digital versions have since returned with the Amazon agreeing to taking a 30 percent commission from eBook sales rather than buying them wholesale. The result means Amazon will actually make money now on eBook sales and ironically, book publishers make less (30 percent of $15 is still less than the old wholesale price of $12.99-$14.99).
You have to wonder whether Macmillian and book publishers have paid any attention to the past 10 years, watching the recording industry shrivel up as it fought tooth and law brief against digital media (and still hasn’t given up on its road to irrelevance). First, my belief is that book publishers know increasing eBook prices will hurt sales. This is made apparent by several publishers’ urging to delay eBook releases for weeks after the hard cover. Much like movie companies delaying Netflix rentals a month after the DVD is released, book publishers don’t want to siphon readers away from their high margin hard cover books.
Of course, this only annoys customers. If customers want the eBook but one is not available, there are more than enough unauthorized versions on file-sharing networks on the day of release. You can’t compete with free by staying home and sulking.
But then book publishers want to charge higher prices. Well, let’s see how well that done for the recording industry on iTunes. iTunes allowed higher and lower prices on music beginning last year and the results have shown such a large drop in unit sales that overall revenue is down. Growth in digital sales slowed from 20 percent in 2008 to 8 percent in 2009. While yes there was still growth, that is a massive drop in a still infant industry. The price elasticity of digital goods is extremely sensitive to increases in prices (and seems even more sensitive to drops, as video game download service Steam has successfully proven with its sales).
As I and others will say over and over again, digital goods are infinite goods. Basic economics says their price should be zero. And there are several examples of free eBooks actually increasing the sales of the actual book. But economics and real-life examples don’t matter when you have a former monopoly on distribution to protect. But business evolves and like the recording industry, book publishers may be in for a difficult decade.













4 Comments
February 11, 2010 at 11:29 am
You could argue that publishers have learned a lot from the music industry; the thing they’re determined to avoid is allowing someone else to control your pricing model for their own gain.
As someone else said recently, it’s fascinating to hear people talk about how the market should be allowed to set a price for ebooks and then watch the yelling and screaming which goes on when someone challenges Amazon’s artificial pricing scheme…
I agree absolutely that publishing needs to get to grips with digital and stop playing dog in the manger. At the same time, I also think it’s possible that the challenge to the Amazon’s and the Kindle’s dominance was absolutely vital for that to happen.
NH
February 15, 2010 at 12:21 pm
I agree that Amazon/Kindle should be challenged much like Apple/iTunes should be challenged. When I and likely others talk about market determining the price, basic economics over digital goods deems the price should be pushed down to at or almost $0 because the marginal price is $0. That’s why Amazon is undercutting Apple’s pricing on music.
What’s happening here is a book publisher is trying to tell the market what the price should be. For decades, book publishers, movie companies, and record labels had a monopoly on the entire distribution and could charge monopoly rates (remember $20 CDs). Now, because of file-sharing and legal streaming/online stores, they no longer have control of distribution. Amazon has more power to determine pricing than Tower Records because Amazon isn’t desperate for the next Britney album to increase store traffic.
May 18, 2010 at 1:24 am
i have just signed up with the amazon affiliate program and i am still not earning a good deal of cash from them.`,~
July 10, 2010 at 7:58 pm
Amazon Affiliate program pays much better than other affiliate programs out there.-’,