A paper from New York University researchers analyzes the methods used by the content industry to annoy and stop file-sharing on BitTorrent networks. They found the practices of MediaDefender and other organizations presented no more than a nuisance to downloaders despite costing the content industry millions of dollars.
Prithula Dhungel, Di Wub and Keith Ross reviewed two specific methods use to slow down BitTorrent downloads. The first called “piece attack” involves trying to upload as many failed connections or hash fails as possible. Second, there is the “connection attack” where TCP connections are blocked preventing downloaders from accessing the actual content. The researchers found these methods did slow download speeds, but not enough to deter downloading. Additionally, blocklists which can be easily found online increased speeds by 30-35 percent. BitTorrent client uTorrent only encountered hostile connections 2 percent of the time while Azureus had only 18 percent.
Emails from a few years ago estimate that music companies pay up to $4,000 for each month of MediaDefender protecting one album. As many already suspected, this money is likely being flushed down the digital drain. Downloaders are not being deterred and certainly not being encouraged to buy content in another way. The content industry is spending massive sums of money to fight against consumers preferred method of distribution. The ethics of file-sharing are not the point – basic economics, as always, is. Consumers by the millions are using file-sharing networks to find the content they want and share that content with other people. This is a good thing that should be embraced, not fought. As we’ve seen, embracing new technology increases the size of your market and the money you can make, not decreases.
